Mazda CX-30 VS Toyota C-HR

In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, making it a strong contender for those seeking a premium feel. On the other hand, the C-HR excels in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, catering to buyers who prioritize practicality and value.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR stands out with its distinctive and bold design that combines sleek, angular lines with a sporty posture. Its comfortable and stylish interior is equipped with advanced technology features, providing a seamless driving experience. The vehicle offers impressive handling and performance, making it a compelling choice for those who appreciate a blend of practicality and flair on the road.

The compact SUV market is vibrant and full of options, but two models that stand out are the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota C-HR. Both vehicles offer a mix of style, performance, and innovative technology. In this comparison, we will explore the technical aspects, features, and innovations of each model to help you decide which vehicle is the right fit for you.

Design and Dimensions

The Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek and elegant design that reflects the brand’s Kodo design philosophy. With a length of 4,395 mm and a width of 1,795 mm, it offers a robust stance while maintaining a graceful profile. The CX-30 has a height of 1,540 mm, providing a spacious interior and good headroom for passengers.

On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR presents a more dynamic and aggressive look, characterized by its sculpted body lines and distinctive silhouette. The C-HR measures 4,362 mm in length and 1,832 mm in width, standing at a height of either 1,558 mm or 1,564 mm depending on the variant. This design emphasis grants the C-HR a sporty edge that is particularly appealing to younger consumers.

Engine and Performance

When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-30 offers petrol mild-hybrid choices, with power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP depending on the variant. It has commendable torque figures of 238 Nm and 240 Nm, coupled with an automatic or manual gearbox, and an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 8.3 to 10.3 seconds.

The Toyota C-HR, in contrast, features a combination of full hybrid and plugin hybrid engines, providing power outputs from 140 HP up to 223 HP, providing a more varied range for the performance-oriented driver. The hybrid variants present outstanding fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km. The C-HR's acceleration times stand from 7.4 seconds to 9.9 seconds, ensuring engaging performance on the road.

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel consumption is a crucial aspect of any vehicle purchase. The Mazda CX-30 has a range of consumption figures depending on the engine choice, averaging around 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km for everyday driving. With a fuel tank capacity of 51L, the CX-30 is useful for longer journeys with fewer stops at the pump.

In comparison, the Toyota C-HR excels in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid variants that can achieve consumption ratings as low as 4.7 L/100 km. Its smaller 43L fuel tank capacity may mean more frequent stops, but its impressive hybrid technology compensates with long-range capability on electric power alone, boasting an electric range of up to 67 km.

Interior Space and Comfort

Interior comfort is paramount in this segment, and both models offer spacious, well-designed cabins. The Mazda CX-30 comfortably seats five passengers and features a trunk capacity of 430L, which is slightly roomier than the C-HR's 424L (depending on the variant). The interior is lined with high-quality materials, showcasing Mazda’s commitment to craftsmanship.

The Toyota C-HR also seats five but offers slightly less space with a trunk capacity ranging from 350L to 447L. Despite this, the C-HR’s interior is designed with a focus on modernity and minimalistic aesthetics, enhanced by a futuristic dashboard layout that integrates advanced technology seamlessly.

Safety Innovations

Both vehicles prioritize safety, equipped with a range of advanced safety technologies. The Mazda CX-30 features an array of driver assistance systems including adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking, making it a strong contender in safety ratings.

The Toyota C-HR equally invests in safety, featuring Toyota’s Safety Sense suite in its standard package across most trims. It includes features like pre-collision systems, lane tracing assist, and adaptive cruise control, making it a compelling choice for safety-conscious buyers.

Conclusion

In the head-to-head comparison of the Mazda CX-30 and Toyota C-HR, both vehicles bring their unique strengths to the compact SUV market. The CX-30 fascinates with its powerful engine options, stylish design, and spacious interior, while the C-HR leads with its fuel-efficient hybrid technology, sporty aesthetics, and advanced safety features. Ultimately, your decision will come down to your personal preferences regarding performance, efficiency, and design. Whichever option you choose, you're bound to enjoy a remarkable driving experience in these two exceptional SUVs.